Mustafina clearly had better execution with stuck landings
and no hip angle when she landed. Ferrari clearly had more difficulty, starting
off with a double twisting double back somersault and performing a new element
in the CoP, a ring leap 1/1.
Vanessa Ferrari
Judge’s score: 14.9
D Score: 6.2
E Score: 8.6
My score: 14.8
D Score: 6.2
E Score: 8.6
[Deductions – 1.4]
.1 low landing on double double
.1 step on double double
.1 leg separation on full in
.1 hop on back tuck (after full in)
.1 stood in corner too long before 3rd tumbling
pass
.1 leg separation on 1.5 twist
.1 hop on front full
.1 hop on split leap 1.5
.1 lack of precision on split leap 1.5
.1 feet were not together on “ferrari” leap landing
.1 leg separation on double pike
.1 low landing on double pike
.1 hop on double pike
Aliya Mustafina
Judge’s score: 14.9
My score: 14.9
D Score: 5.9
E Score: 9.0
[Deductions – 1.0]
.1 cowboyed double Arabian
.1 crossed legs on 2.5
.1 leg separation on punch front full
.1 lack of precision on memmel turn
.1 step on double back
.1 crossed legs on triple twist
.1 stood in corner too long before triple twist
.1 low landing on triple twist
.1 hop on triple twist
Verdict: Aliya deservedly
took her 4th Olympic medal.
So many gymnasts just used this rule to cheat. A CONTROLLED step is fine but if you look like you had to take a step then it should be a deduction. And technically, this is a subjective thing. Maybe that step looked controlled to one judge but not to another, so 1 judge deducts and the other doesn't.
I mean c'mon! These are olympic class and world class gymnasts and they cant stick their tumbling passes? 1 lunge is fine in a routine, just like the men can do the rollouts on 2 of their tumbling passes, but any more than that is just babying the gymnasts. If these girls can't stick double doubles and double layouts then maybe they shouldn't be doing them in the first place. I'm not trying to insult the gymnasts because what they do is incredible and most people in the world can't do what they do but I don't see why they shouldn't have to stick the landing like the men.
One more thing... Why the **** couldn't the men lunge like the women?!?!?
On the plus side i do LOVE the leaps out of the tumbling passes. I don't really get why most people hate them. In my opinion, it's more artistic than the lunge because you're combing acrobatic and dance elements just like you would do on the balance beam. Furthermore, the leap connections increases the gymnast's difficulty value on the floor which is a good thing because floor exercise is usually judged pretty harshly. With the leaps, floor is one step closer to having equal scoring with the rest of the 3 apparatus.
That being said, I only like the leaps when they're done right, which is pretty much every gymnast except Lauren Mitchell.
The lunge rule was nothing more than sexist and unfair rule and I'm glad it's gone. #deuces
Vault: This was the apparatus in which Shawn had a huge
advantage over Nastia. Shawn performs a
2.5 twist compared to Nastia’s 1.5 twist.
Shawn’s start value was a full point higher than Nastia. Therefore, unless Shawn fell on her butt she
was pretty much guaranteed a higher score than Nastia.
Nastia’s Vault: Hands down the best vault Nastia’s
ever done. She definitely made the most
out of her less difficult vault with a stuck landing and lovely form to boot. She really lacks a good block off the
vaulting table to perform a harder vault but performs her less difficult vault here with the utmost perfection.
Judge’s score: 15.025
D: 5.5
E: 9.525
My score: 15.1
D: 5.5
E: 9.6
[Deductions: 0.4]
0.1 lack of height
0.1 lack of distance
0.1 did not land in the middle of the mat
0.1 low landing (deviation from ideal position)
Shawn’s Vault: In warmups, Shawn performed possibly
one of the best Amanars I’ve ever seen her do, just like Tim Dagget said. She’s no Mckalya Maroney on vault but her
power, short stature, and good form make this a good scoring event for
her. In terms of deductions, she had a large step on the landing. Even
more importantly though, Shawn’s vault was quite under rotated. It was really more like a 2.25 twisting
yurchenko. Regardless of how under
rotated a salto is, the CoP states that the highest deduction for being under rotated
(without a fall) is 0.1.
Judge’s score: 15.875
D: 6.5
E: 9.375
My Score: 15.8
D: 6.5
E: 9.3
[Deductions: 0.7]
0.1 lack of height
0.1 lack of distance
0.1 under rotated
0.1 low landing (deviation from ideal position)
0.3 step on landing
0.1 did not land in middle of the matt
Uneven Bars: Just like Shawn had the advantage on Vault,
Nastia had the advantage on the Uneven Bars.
She shared the highest start value in the world at the time, a 7.7, with
2 Chinese gymnasts: He Kexin and Yang Yilin.
Her long lines, high release moves, and difficult pirouettes make this a
good scoring apparatus for her. On the other hand, Shawn is not as strong on the
bars so she needed to rely on getting a huge execution score to combine with
her lower difficulty score.
Nastia’s Bars:
A nice clean routine from Nastia sans the dismount. Most of her deductions came from her
handstands and the dismount.
Judge’s Score: 16.650
D: 7.7
E: 8.950
My Score: 16.5
D: 7.7
E: 8.8
[Deductions: 1.2]
0.5 Insufficient extension in kips or casts/lack of
handstand in kips and casts (x5)
0.1 late handstand on ono ½ pirouette
0.1 leg separation on pak salto
0.1 cowboyed double front
0.1 low landing
0.3 step on landing
Shawn’s Bars:This
is without a doubt Shawn’s weakest event but she’s definitely not a bad bars
worker. She’s ‘spectacular’ on beam and
floor but is just ‘good’ on bars. The important
thing here was to try to execute everything as perfectly as she could, which
she managed to do with her ‘G’ rated dismount.
Judge’s Score: 15.733
D: 6.6
E: 9.133
My Score: 15.8
D: 6.6
E: 9.2
[Deductions: 0.8]
0.4 Insufficient extension in kips or casts/lack of
handstand in kips and casts (x4)
0.1 bent arms when catching the bar on Ginger
0.3 late handstand on pirouette
Balance Beam: Nastia was the reigning world champion on
this event while Shawn got last place in the beam finals at the 2007
worlds. However, Shawn has a 0.3
advantage in terms of difficult over Nastia.
However, when you do the bigger and harder skills (such as the standing
full and the full in dismount that Shawn does) it leaves more room for the
judges to deduct on low landings and possible steps. While Nastia lacks the acrobatic prowess that
Shawn possesses, she still manages to bring accumulate a large D score with her
difficult leaps that require her to lose complete sight of the beam momentarily.
Nastia’s Beam: What frustrated me was that the judges
gave her connection bonus for her supposed Onodi + Wolf Jump 1/1 combination
when she clearly did not connect the skills.
I mean even Tim freakin Dagget, who is an idiot, was blabbing on about
how she didn’t deserve the connection.
Regardless, this was a clean set from the world champion and she
certainly deserved that high execution score.
Judge’s score: 16.125
D: 6.7
E: 9.425
My Score: 16.0
D: 6.6
E: 9.4
[Deductions: 0.6]
0.1 heel dropped prematurely on full turn
0.1 slight shuffle on side somersault
0.1 arm movements used for balance ‘Liukin’
0.1 head not held long enough on switch ring leap
0.1 slight balance check on switch ring leap
0.1 crossed legs on 2.5 twist
Shawn’s Beam: This routine had something I’ve never
seen Shawn do, a balance check. She also had quite a few low landings on some of her acrobatic elements because they are so difficult to perform.
Judge’s Score: 16.0
D: 7.0
E: 9.0
My score: 16.0
D: 7.0
E: 9.0
[Deductions: 1.0]
0.1 leg separation on layout
0.1 bent legs on piked front
0.1 low landing on piked front
0.3 low landing on standing tucked full (chest touching
knees)
0.1 balance check on standing full
0.1 lack flexibility on switch split leap
0.1 legs not parallel to beam on Johnson
0.1 low landing on full in (chest at hip level)
0.1 step on full in
Floor Exercise: Shawn was the reigning world champion on
floor and technically had a more difficult routine than Nastia. Just like on balance beam, even though Nastia’s
routine doesn’t seem as hard as Shawn’s, Nastia was only 0.2 lower than Shawn’s
potential D score. Nevertheless, the
judges didn’t always credit her switch ring leap and her straddle jump 1.5 so
she didn’t get her difficulty advantage over Nastia.
Nastia’s Floor: She’s had to rework her entire
routine so that she’s pretty much only doing front tumbling due to an ankle injury,
which prevents her from doing back handsprings.
Nastia also has some form issues (crossed legs on her twists and an
EXTREMELY cowboyed double front) however the code only allows 0.1 deduction no
matter how cowboyed a salto is or how badly a gymnast crosses his or her legs
during twists. Despite her form issues, Nastia
does not suffer from low landing deductions like most gymnasts because it is
easier to land upright when doing a front tumble (even though it has a blind
landing)
Judge’s Score: 15.525
D: 6.2
E: 9.325
My Score: 15.3
D: 6.2
E: 9.1
[Deductions: 0.9]
0.1 crossed legs on double twist
0.1 cowboyed legs on double front
0.1 hop on split leap 1/1
0.1 crossed legs on 1.5
0.1 crossed legs on 1.5 punch front
0.1 hop on 1.5 punch front
0.1 leg not held at horizontal on turn
0.1 hop on switch leap ½
0.1 crossed legs on 2.5
Shawn’s Floor: At this point, Nastia was leading
Shawn by an enormous 0.6. In gymnastics
terms, where the line between gold and silver can be differentiated by a thousandth
of a point, Nastia was light years away from Shawn. She needed a number in the 16’s to catch up
to Nastia, something that just wasn’t possible on floor exercise. Shawn knew that but still gave a huge and
powerful floor routine that was certainly worthy of a medal. Shawn performed one of the best double
doubles I’ve ever seen her do and finally competed her front 1/1 + front rudi
combination. However, she had the usual
big uncontrolled step on her whip to triple twist combination and the lack of
rotation in her straddle jump 1.5.
It wasn’t so much that Shawn was under scored but that
Nastia was over scored. Personally, I have a feeling
the judge’s preferred Nastia’s graceful and elegant style over Shawn’s powerful
gymnastics. The fact that Nastia won by
over 0.6 is absolutely ridiculous and totally sounds fishy to me. Granted, people complain about Nastia's form issues like her crossed legs during twists and cowboyed saltos but each one of those is only a 0.1 deduction. No matter how bad form errors may look they're only just 0.1 in deductions.
Regardless of who won it was already too late. Shawn was already considered America’s sweetheart
with her perky attitude and pixie like stature.
She was reminiscent of America’s first sweetheart, Mary Lou
Rhetton. Even though Shawn didn’t have
the gold medal on her neck, from the endorsements and media attention she was
getting, it seemd like she had actually won.
(Infact, I didn’t watch the 2008 Olympics but I remember hearing about
and seeing Shawn Johnson everywhere. It
wasn’t until I actually started watching gymnastics that I knew who Nastia was
and that she actually had actually won the all around and not Shawn. So in a way, I do think Shawn did win...
Disclaimer: I am NOT nor will I EVER be a Women’s Artistic
Gymnastics judge. I’m certainly not
qualified for the position… nor am I a woman.
I am simply stating my opinion on the performance of the athletes, the scoring
of the judges and finally who should have won the All Around in my opinion.
Setting: One year ago, the Women's Artistic Gymnastics All Around Competition at the 2012 Olympics. Only one gymnast would leave the arena with the coveted jewel of gymnastics, the All Around title. Everyone knew that coming in the real battle would be between USA's Gabrielle Douglas and Russia's Viktoria Komova. Viktoria Komova of Russian Federation was the number 1 qualifier coming into the competition. She lost the World Championships by 0.033 (that's 33 THOUSANDTHS of a point) to Jordyn Wieber and everyone knew that Komova was coming to the Olympics to get the title and she wasn't looking for a bronze or silver. Gabby Douglas was a relatively new gymnast on the international stage. Her first major international competition was the 2011 Worlds where she did not qualify to the AA because both Aly Raisman and Jordyn Wieber qualified ahead of her (sound familiar?). Since then Gabby has been slowly climbing up the ranks while upgrading to an Amanar vault and finally gaining some mental steadiness on the balance beam.
Vault: Many argue that this was the event that really
sealed Viktoria’s silver laden fate and I agree with this statement. Under this new CoP vault has been the highest
scoring event. Thus, it’s important to
begin your competition off with a strong vault (just ask Nastia and Shawn)
Both of the Olympic debutants performed that 2.5 twist, the
Amanar. This was the hardest vault being performed in the all around and the
hardest vault that was performed successfully at the Olympics (I’m looking at
you Yamilet Peña) Thus it all came down to the execution.
Gabby’s Vault: Gabby performed a nice consistent
vault, nearly identical to the ones she performed in the Team Qualifications
and in the Team Finals. It almost looks
like she crosses her legs during the twists but in reality she doesn’t so the
judges may have taken off for that because they do not use the convenient
replay button ...
My Score: 15.8
D: 6.5
E: 9.3
[Deductions: 0.7]
0.1lack
of height
0.1 lack of distance
0.1started
twisting too early
0.2 steps on the landing
0.1 bent knees right before landing
0.1did
not land in the middle of the line
Viktoria’s Vault: I’m not really sure what happened
here. She gets nearly the same height as
Gabby and is a bit more off the side than her but she could have saved the
vault by just talking a step off the side with just one of her feet. I’m not exactly sure what was going through
her mind as she was performing this vault.
Judge’s score: 15.466
D: 6.5
E: 8.966
My score: 15.2
D: 6.5
E: 8.7
[Deductions: 1.3]
0.1 lack of height
0.1 lack of distance
0.1 crossed legs during twisting
0.1 started twisting too early
0.1 bent knees right before landing
0.1 did not landing in the middle of the line
0.3 big step after landing
0.1 another small step after her first one
0.3 both feet stepped out of bounds
Uneven Bars: If there was an area where Komova could
have taken Gabby, much like in the Team Finals where the Russians could have
taken the lead over the Americans, it was on the Uneven Bars. Vika had a 0.4 advantage over Gabby in
difficulty alone and had outperformed the American gymnast in Team
Qualifications and in the Team Finals.
Viktoria’s Bars:
As stated earlier, Komova had the advantage on the Uneven Bars, she was
the reigning world champion and had one of the highest difficult values in the
competition, a 7.0 She has a massive
array of skills like a laid out Jaeger (G) and a double double dismount
(F). The only real problem with her
routine is that instead of connecting skills together, Komova separates them by
performing simple handstands. She does
very difficult skills so her difficulty is still extremely high, however it
leads to a possible deductions for the judges to take off because it is nearly
impossible to hit a PERFECT 180 degrees on those handstands.
Judge’s Score: 15.966
D: 7.0
E: 8.966
My Score: 15.9
D: 7.0
E: 8.9
[Deductions: 1.1]
0.3 lack of 180 degrees on handstand (x3)
0.1 slight piked form on laid out Jaeger
0.1 leg separation on piked Tkatchev
0.3 lack of handstand on Giant ½
0.3 big hop after Fabrichnova (Double Double) dismount
*Funny how she got the same execution for a nearly flawless
bars routine as her botched vault…* But I’ll blog about the judging disparities
between apparatuses a little bit later…
Gabby’s Bars:Known
as the “Flying Squirrel” to the World, Douglas stays true to her given nickname
and really does some sky high release skills.
She doesn’t have Komova’s difficulty but I would say her routine is constructed
better than Komova’s due to having fewer cast to handstands and more
connections. Though many state
otherwise, Gabby’s form is just as good as Vika’s on this piece of apparatus. I sort of did expect Komova to do better than
Gabby in terms of execution but I really struggled to find deductions in
Gabby’s routine.
Judge’s Score: 15.733
D: 6.6
E: 9.133
My Score: 15.8
D: 6.6
E: 9.2
[Deductions: 0.8]
0.1 lack of handstand after endo with ½ turn
0.1 slight leg separation on piked Tkatchev
0.1 late pirouette (finished after handstand)
0.1 lack 180 degrees on handstand
0.1 piked form on double layout
0.3 hop on double layout
Balance Beam: This apparatus has caused much trouble to
many great gymnasts but both Gabby and Vika managed to get through the blight
of women’s gymnastics unscathed with only a few tenths lose here and there.
Viktoria’s Beam: Komova had a great beam routine in
the Team Qualifications and managed to qualify into second place in the Beam
Final with a score of 15.266. Her beam
routine the Team Finals however was less than stellar, especially towards the
end. She had trouble with her first major connections (Full turn with leg at horizontal – Aerial Walkover –
Back Tuck – Sheep Jump) and definitely missed some connections in her routine
as she had a maximum 6.6 Difficulty value but was only given a 6.4
Judge’s score: 15.441
D: 6.4
E: 9.041
My Score: 15.5
D: 6.4
E: 9.1
[Deductions: 0.9]
0.1 leg dropped abruptly after full turn
0.1 balance check on standing Arabian
0.1 lack of flexibility on sissone
0.1 balance check on front tuck
0.1 step after switch leap
0.1 cowboyed double Arabian
0.3 step on double arabian
Gabby’s Beam: If there was one event that had Marta
Karolyi biting on her fake ass nails it was the beam. Gabby has shown many a time that she simply cannot
handle the mental pressure while performing on the beam. However, all throughout the Olympic Games
Gabby performed amazingly on the beam (with the exception of the balance beam
finals) Nevertheless, Gabby was definitely over scored on beam by a couple of
tenths, I don’t think the judges were strict enough on her low landings, some
of which were at hip level.
Judge’s Score: 15.5
D: 6.5
E: 9.0
My score: 15.2
D: 6.5
E: 8.7
[Deductions: 1.3]
0.1 balance check on layout step out
0.1 low landing on the standing back with full twist
0.1 balance check on full twist
0.1 balance check on back pike
0.1 low landing on back pike
0.1 lack of flexibility on sissone
0.1 low landing on back tuck
0.1 squat on tucked front
0.1 balance check on switch ring leap
0.1 low landing on double pike (head at hip level)
0.3 hop on double pike
Floor Exercise: Both Komova and Douglas had trouble on
the floor in Qualifications, with both of them scoring in the high 13’s. Gabby had a huge mistake on her double
Arabian pass and literally flew out of bounds due to having too much
power. The difficulty value given to her
by the judges was also significantly lower than what it could have been due to
underotating her leaps and turns.
Although Komova did not have a huge error like Gabby did, she did not stick a single one of her tumbling passes and gave away valuable tenths on hops and steps on the landings.
Gabby’s Floor: Gabby finished her Olympic All Around
experience with yet another consistent and great routine. She hit all of her tumbling passes and only
had minor errors on some of the dance elements.
She was not given her full 6.2 difficulty most likely due to under
rotating her split leap 1.5. Although
not as refined as Komova’s, Gabby’s floor was unique and the crowd certainly
took a liking to the catchy and clap worthy music.
Judge’s score: 15.033
D: 6.1
E: 8.933
My Score: 15.0
D: 6.1
E: 9.0
[Deductions: 1.0]
0.1 crossed legs on triple twist
0.3 hop back after triple twist
0.1 step back after split leap 1.5
0.1 excessive preparation for pirouette
0.1 fell out of turn
0.1 stood in corner too long before starting 3rd
tumbling pass
0.1 low landing on full twisting double back
0.1 hop forward on the full twisting double back
Viktoria’s Floor:
Komova definitely delivered with perhaps the best floor routine at the
entire Olympics. The Komova we all saw
that day on Qualifications seemed to be replaced by this great floor worker out
of nowhere. She stuck ALL of her
tumbling passes (besides a small shuffle on her triple twist) and managed to up
her difficulty and decrease her landing deductions by adding leaps after some
of her tumbling passes. This was a very
smart and seemingly veteran decision on her part.
Judge’s Score: 15.1
D: 6.0
E: 9.1
My Score: 15.2
D: 6.0
E: 9.2
[Deductions: 0.8]
0.1 cowboyed double Arabian
0.1 cowboyed double back
0.1 hop on split leap 1/1
0.1 crossed legs on triple twist
0.1 hop on triple twist
0.1 stood in corner too long before 4th tumbling
pass
As you can see from the results I feel that Gabby was
slightly over scored on vault and quite over scored on the beam. Komova was judged pretty fairly but wasn’t deducted
enough on her vault. So in my opinion
Gabby did deserve to win the 2012 Olympic All Around title. '
Despite this, I feel like people don’t give Gabby enough
credit though. Komova definitely left a
lasting impression on the judges and the audience with her immaculate floor
routine but we can’t forget her huge mistake on the vault. She’s a lovely gymnast with so much grace and
power but it just seems like she gives up too easily. Obviously if Komova didn't comletely come off the mat on her vault she would have walked away with the gold medal... but I don't believe in 'if's' and 'buts'. In the end, Gabby
certainly did have 4 consistent routines and after all isn’t that what it means
to be the All Around champion?
The FIG is infamous for devaluing various skills each quad, especially if they have been performed a lot. Their logic is simple: if this skill has been performed by many gymnasts then it's obviously too easy. Nevertheless, in the 2013 - 2016 quad the FIG actually upgraded the hardest skills on women's floor exercise: the the double twisting double back (AKA the double double or 'Silivas') and the full twisting double layout (FDL) from a G rating to an H rating.
I've seen many people on the gymternet argue about which skill is harder to throw, the double twisting double back (AKA the double double or 'Silivas') or the full twisting double layout (FDL) .
One way to deduct which skill is harder is to look at the active number of gymnasts performing the skill. Looking at the 2012 London Olympics, 5 girls threw the double double during the competition: Jordyn Wieber (USA), Vanessa Ferrari (ITALY), Anastasia Grishina (RUS), Victoria Moors (CAN), Larisa Iordache (ROM). Interestingly, not a single woman performed the full twisting double layout. Perhaps because it is harder?
Perhaps another way to look at this conundrum is look at the skill right below. For example, a double double is really just a full in with another twist. Likewise, a FLO is just a double layout with a full twist. A full in on floor is an E rating while a double layout is an F.
Personally I think the FLO is harder to chuck than the double double because of these reasons and more. I've seen double doubles that are lacking in height (*cough*Anastasia Grishina *cough*) but in terms of form breaks, I have never seen a double double with ''bad form". The gymnast always has her legs glued together throughout the tucked position. On the other hand, I rarely see a double layout or a FLO with perfect form because it is so difficult to do so. The gymnast always seems to have their legs separated at some portions if not all throughout the somorsault. Sometimes the gymnasts pike a little as well.
Conclusion: The FLO is just a bit more difficult in my opinion. However, in the end, it will all depend on the gymnasts individual abilities and talents :)
